Most Africans from sub-Saharan Africa strongly condemn this war imposed on Colonel Muammar Gaddafi. For us this war is categorically unfair. The oil war brings the power to inflame the nations today just to exploit their natural resources. Indeed, the Western powers take their wealth in the wells of injustice and whatever the consequences that can result. As I said before, terrorism that Westerners are trying to fight vigorously, their is profitable when it is in countries where the subsoil is rich in oil. If Gaddafi never yield to the armed insurgency and media, Libya is a nation totally destroyed because it is the main goal of Western powers to have an excuse when sending an intervention force to combat pseudo-extremists. Now all this is the sole intention of exploiting the country's wealth. Those who are now mine to be the defenders of freedom and of siding with the people, were only yesterday the accomplices of dictators that they want to see any price drop. It is therefore understandable that they are always the side of profit and when it is in danger, they fall back toward the new benefit. We all know that the powers have never liked the Colonel, but they were forced to a moment in history to cooperate with him. And now for them, the use of puppets is a way for them to get rid of him. We all know that this differs from previous Libyan revolt that we have seen in other northern countries. Yet it is they who inspired the Libyan people. We no longer speak of demonstrators, but an armed rebellion. And rebellion must be quelled. Even the terrorist wing supports Akmi the armed insurgency of Western puppets. But that n'interpelle person. For once in history, the extremists and their enemies which are the United States and its allies have agreed to a fallen man. And this leads us to think much about the real reason of this Agreement invraissemblable and senseless. Gaddafi is accused today to shoot the "demonstrators", yet in 2004, the French army based in Côte d'Ivoire has a real havoc in the machine-gunning unarmed demonstrators who came to express their displeasure when the position France in the War of the Ivory Coast. And has no power condemned the act, rather it is the Côte d'Ivoire Laurent Gbagbo, who was convicted and sentenced by the UN. We still remember the black day in our country. However, other Ivorian and even political leaders, have approved the atrocities committed by the French army as if those who were killed were not from the Ivory Coast. While they were fighting for their enemy, but they are humans who have been shredded by the heavy weapons of the neo-colonists. I wonder if the right to kill Africans or people of weak nations is only possible for strong nations. For up to date, a total muetisme around this crime against humanity and in the case of others, we know that there automacally an international criminal court. We are in a world of real injustice. It's pathetic, but when the situation is in our favor, there is nothing against this neo-colonialism. I am among those who believe in the freedom of our continent. I even wrote in my work awakening of conscience, accusing the Western powers as causes problems for us, is an act of bad faith. My writing now, some will say that I rejoind the camp of the accusers, but I say no. For me, we in the middle of everything. Mécrivait someone yesterday, telling me my biggest enemy was my ignorance of the history of Africa, because I wrote that Laurent Robert Mugabe and are people who are soon from power by a revolution. For the latter, these are fighters for freedom in Africa. For he writes: "We fought against the infernal machine of the neo-colonists to you today our young people live in dignity, freedom, and respect. But unfortunately, our fights were never appreciated by those for whom we fought. "Gbagbo For him, Mugabe and leaders to embody the freedom of the black man and in general for all Africa. I say no to that. Gbagbo, who mine today to fight for African and especially for the Ivorians did nothing positive for his people during his ten years at the helm of our nation. How can we claim to fight for a people so let the people in suffering and misery. During his ten years at the helm of our nation, we had reached a stage of orgasm of debauchery by those Dirrig Côte d'Ivoire. It fesait promoting dédiocrité the detriment of good. The challenge was no longer in our vocabulary. Gbagbo even denigrating France today, almost signed all major contracts in our country with it. So what is he talking about fighting against France? As for Mugabe, he has made what may be the nightmare of a people. No good positive except dolarisation its currency. The Zimbabwean people suffer, and poverty is at the end. He longs for change but Mugabe needed the people. We can condemn if the West imposes on us the leaders, but even when we, the people freely choose our leaders, this choice must be respected. Vive la revolution
Cheers change
